12.02.2022

#Illuminati
#Miscaptioned
#ConspiratorialThinking

#Illuminati
#Miscaptioned
#ConspiratorialThinking
12.02.2022
Miscaptioned photo spreads Balenciaga fashion controversy
The luxury fashion brand Balenciaga found itself embroiled in controversy after publishing an advertising campaign featuring children with teddy bears dressed in what appeared to be bondage gear. But bad faith actors have distorted the situation with a spate of false posts. Let’s look at the facts.
Quick Look
- No
This is not a photo of Lotta Volkova.
- No
Volkova is not the chief designer at Balenciaga (she left the company in 2018) and had no part in the company’s recent advertising campaigns.
- Yes
This is a photo of a fashion model on a runway showcasing the collection of designer Sheguang Hu during Mercedes-Benz China Fashion Week 2016.
- Yes
Another recent Balenciaga ad campaign created controversy by showing printed material related to a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision on child pornography.
The Takeaway
Misinformation often plays on strong emotions. When an incident makes people angry, propagandists spread rumors that tap into and exploit that anger.
In November, after Balenciaga’s ads attracted controversy, a miscaptioned photo went viral with false claims that it depicted one of the company’s chief designers in a devil-like outfit holding a pair of dolls painted blood red. The misleading photo was part of a budding conspiratorial narrative that Balenciaga is involved in devil worship. Many conspiracy theorists took things even further, trying to connect Balenciaga with antisemitic illuminati beliefs.
Balenciaga apologized for the advertisements, stating that the company “strongly condemn(s) child abuse” and it was not their intent “to include (child abuse) in our narrative,” as well as admitting to a “series of grievous errors.”
The 5 Factors
We’ve determined that this viral rumor is misleading or false based on its failure to pass the following credibility factors. Please note that these factors do not represent degrees of falsehood. A post that fails a single factor is generally just as false as a post that fails all five.
Snapshot
Source
Evidence
Context
- Authenticity
- Reasoning
Is there evidence that proves the claim?
No.
A reverse image search reveals this image was originally taken in 2016 and shows a model who is not affiliated with Balenciaga at a fashion show in China. Fact-checkers also spoke with Volkova, who confirmed she has not worked with the company since 2018 and had been a stylist there, not a top designer.
Is it authentic?
N/A
Is it based on solid reasoning?
N/A
The Techniques
Lesson
Understanding Bias
Website
News Lit Quiz: Avoid the trap of conspiratorial thinking
Website
Tutorial: Reverse image search
Website
Tutorial: Lateral reading
Website
News Lit Quiz: Should you share it?
Website
News Lit Quiz: Is it legit? Vetting news sources for credibility
Featured Fact checks
, Reuters Fact Check
Melissa Goldin, The Associated Press
Nur Ibrahim, Snopes
Alex Kuli, Lead Stories