An Instagram post reads, “Eye of the Pfizer #wtf #Eyeofthetiger #fafo #boosted” and features a video of singer Katy Perry oddly blinking. The News Literacy Project has added a label that says, “NOT VACCINE SIDE EFFECT.”

#Antivax

#ConspiratorialThinking

#COVID19

An Instagram post reads, “Eye of the Pfizer #wtf #Eyeofthetiger #fafo #boosted” and features a video of singer Katy Perry oddly blinking. The News Literacy Project has added a label that says, “NOT VACCINE SIDE EFFECT.”

#Antivax

#ConspiratorialThinking

#COVID19

Claim falsely attributes Katy Perry’s odd eye movement to COVID-19 vaccine

A viral video of singer Katy Perry’s eye “glitching” was quickly attached to evidence-free claims that the singer was experiencing a side effect from a COVID-19 vaccine. This is not true. Let’s look at the facts.

Quick Look

The Takeaway

Anti-vaccination trolls often try to find ways to attribute strange viral moments to the COVID-19 vaccines, but such claims lack evidence and have the potential to spread harm. This video of Perry’s eye “glitching” during an October 2022 concert was no exception. As the video racked up millions of views, many people dismissed the most likely explanations (Perry had something in her eye, experienced a muscle spasm or used strong eyelash glue) in favor of their preferred conspiratorial ideas. While wide-ranging, these conspiratorial claims all had one critical characteristic in common: a complete lack of evidence.

Conspiracy theories thrive on the absence of information. People want to know the truth and when a clear answer is not immediately available, they may opt to invent one themselves. While this results in some nonsensical ideas that are easily dismissed (rest assured, Perry is not a robot), others may contribute — even subconsciously — to claims that many people take seriously, such as anti-vaccination claims. Perry has been an advocate for vaccinations.

The 5 Factors

We’ve determined that this viral rumor is misleading or false based on its failure to pass the following credibility factors. Please note that these factors do not represent degrees of falsehood. A post that fails a single factor is generally just as false as a post that fails all five.

Snapshot

  • Source

  • Evidence

  • Reasoning

  • Authenticity
  • Context
Source

Has it been posted or confirmed by a credible source?

No.

This claim was not made by an expert or scientific body nor anyone with firsthand knowledge of the situation. Perry herself disavowed any conspiratorial explanations. This claim was spread on social media by people with an anti-vaccination agenda.

Evidence

Is there evidence that proves the claim?

No.

There is no evidence to support this claim. This claim was manufactured to take advantage of a viral moment to spread anti-vaccine misinformation and other conspiracy theories.

Reasoning

Is it based on solid reasoning?

No.

Adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines are rare and “eye glitches” are not a known side effect.

Authenticity

Is it authentic?

N/A

Context

Is the context accurate?

N/A